If you can move a casualty out of enemy fire, should you also try to move the casualty's weapon?

Moving a casualty out of enemy fire is of utmost importance to ensure their safety and provide them with the necessary medical aid. When it comes to the casualty's weapon, the decision to move it should be considered carefully.

The reasoning for the correct answer is that, in many tactical situations, taking a weapon along with the casualty might be necessary to maintain operational readiness and to equip a fellow teammate should the need arise. This is especially true in environments where firing may need to continue or where further engagement could occur.

However, it’s crucial to balance this with the need for speed and safety in the evacuation of the casualty. In certain cases, leaving the weapon behind might actually be a better choice if it means that you can remove the casualty quickly and without exposing yourself to unnecessary danger.

Ultimately, the situation's specifics, such as the immediate threat level and the available cover, will guide whether moving both the casualty and their weapon is feasible. This emphasizes the need for situational awareness and adaptability in combat scenarios.